Monday, December 5, 2011

Works Cited

F.B.I symbol: http://onin.com/fp/fphistory.html (11/12/11)
The 3 Types of Fingerprints: http://www.fingerprinting.com/types-of-fingerprints.php (11/12/11)
Hair and Fiber Links
Scientist analyze and use of hair/fiber data: http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=4109 (11/14/11)
Hair/ Fiber Collection: http://www.careers.govt.nz/image/data/M0273622.jpg (11/16/11)


History of Handwriting: http://www.handwriting.com/facts/history.html (11/16/11)
The List of 12 Handwriting Characteristics: http://www.clt.uwa.edu.au/__data/page/112506/fsp10_handwriting.pdf (11/16/11)

Friday, December 2, 2011

Crime Scene

The Scene: A body was found in a semi wooded area with one footprint on the victim's shoe and another found leaving the scene. All exhibits were outside and relatively close to the body.

Evidence:

Exhibit 1: Was a torn up note that read, "Please forgive me! I love you all!". The writing style of Exhibit 1 matched with Lucas Moore's handwriting characteristics: the loops of his L's and D's were tall and thin. The amount of pressure applied to the note is in similarity of his regular handwriting.




Exhibit 2: A possible hair sample from Lucas Moore, Sandra O' Conner has similar hair color, but the hair sample is short without a curve to indicate that the sample had at one point been long.

Exhibit 3: A fingerprint- Plain arch. According to all of the possible suspects Lucas is the only person to have a plain arch.







Exhibit 4: A substance that might be a possible poison. When tested as a poison all tests came back negative, but when a cocaine reagent was added to the substance the test came back positive. Indicating that suspects caught with drug possession should be questioned.

Exhibit 5 / 6: The body was in a state of active decay because maggots were visible







Exhibit 7: Footprint- The size of the print indicates that it was from a male which leads me to believe that Jet Trong might have been at the scene at the time of death because Jet was convicted of drug possession.





Exhibit 7a: Footprint- This print was a scanned image so the overall size of the print is thrown off so the victim still cannot be classified as a male or female with this evidence.






Exhibit 8: Fingerprint- Ulnar Loop which matches with Sandra O' Conner's print and it makes sense because she is a drug addict, and convicted of multiple drug possessions.






Exhibit 9: Fingerprint- Double Loop- 2 suspects both have a double loop, since Jet is the only person with the print to be convicted of drug possession he is the likely person.






 Exhibit 10: Possible Fiber- A black ,synthetic fiber woven like a rope, transparent on the edges. A possible color treated fiber with frayed ends. This fiber could be either nylon or color treated wool: probably came from Jet's hoodie.

Exhibit 11: Syringe- could've been used to inject the cocaine into the victim's body. Fingerprints were not evident on this evidence.





 P.O.I (Persons of Interest):









The Story: Suffering from depression late one night, Lucas was considering suicide. As a final farewell Lucas decided to write a note, Exhibit 1, but decided against suicide so he tore up the note and stashed it in his pocket. While walking off his thoughts Lucas came across Jet Trong who openly offered Lucas some cocaine. To reduce the likelihood of being caught Jet brought Lucas to the soon to be crime scene. Still overwhelmed with emotion Lucas takes some of the cocaine from a contaminated syringe that was previously used by Sandra O' Conner. Lucas' reaction to the cocaine was presumably to his first encounter with drugs. In addition to Lucas presumably having a reaction to the cocaine, the contaminated syringe could've also been a factor in his death. Startled from Lucas' sudden death, Jet abruptly leaves the scene leaving a footprint as he exits the area. A fiber from Jet's hoodie was found near Lucas' body confirming that Jet had made contact with Lucas. The following morning forensic scientists arrived at the scene to see the body in active decay.

Labs

Footprint Lab    

     This lab involved the siting of a footprint and what the procedure would be when at a crime scene. To start the lab off students from the prior class collected dirt in bins to simulate a sectioned part of the crime scene where the print was found. Prior to creating our prints our groups were required to record some of the conditions, as shown in the picture to the right. A footprint could give a forensic scientist a good amount of information depending on how well the impression is. At times even the brand name and shoe size may be seen! The pattern left by the sole can also determine the type of shoe the attacker was wearing. As for my print I happened to be wearing dress shoes so the heel had a slight incline compared to the rest of the shoe. Since this was a simulated test the only direction the print had to face was north. My group was able to successfully record and produce a print that was seen clearly in order to analyze the impression. By completing this lab I was able to a feel on how forensic scientist examine and record footprints that occur at a crime scene.

Witness Lab

     For this lab each person in my group had to cut out one picture that was similar in size, skin tone and had similar facial expressions as the whole table. Once all of the faces were cut out, the next step was to cut out the individual's hair, forehead, eyes, nose, mouth and ears. One group member had to construct a face using the variety of facial parts for another, and were given 10 seconds to memorize the face before the face was scrambled. After this step they had to pick out the parts and reconstruct the face to the best of their abilities.

     The purpose for this lab was to test to see if we were adequate witnesses. The three of us were able to successfully reconstruct the faces without any errors. Confirming that our group should do relatively well in identifying a suspect.

Lipstick Lab

     For this lab I was required to identify the properties of my lip. In order to do this I had to apply lipstick and kiss the a blank notecard to leave my lip print. By leaving my print I was able to observe the characteristics of my lip as well as my fellow classmates. A few examples of the characteristics that I saw in the classroom was chapped lips, the differences in gap between upper and lower lip and the general shape of the lip. After that test we were required to do the same procedure again and try to identify someone's  lip based on the prior lab. My group was overall successful in matching the lip prints because each lip had a distinct characteristic that stood out from the others.

Create A Profile
Given 5 clues that involved a review of my newly obtained knowledge on forensics: fingerprints, hair/ fiber evidence and lipstick my group and I were required to identify the individual who might have committed the murder.

Clue 1: A set of 4 prints, thumb is missing. Through careful observations my group and I determined that the fingerprints were produced from the right hand. Once identified these four prints included 2 whorls and 2 tented arches. 





Clue 2: Being a hair/ fiber sample the evidence had to be observed underneath a microscope to distinguish that this sample was in fact a hair sample that was most likely color treated.





 Clue 3: A torn up note was also found and after assembling the pieces the note read, "You will never find her!"







Clue 4: Following the same steps for Clue 2 this sample was identified as African American hair.






Clue 5: This piece of evidence could either be a blood stain or a lipstick smudge. Further investigation would be required to determine the mark.







Drug Lab

     Through the use of 3 simulated drugs: "cocaine", "LSD" and "methamphetamine", also known as "meth" my group and I were required to use each drug reagent in order to see if each sample would test positive for any of drug reagents. We were unable to test substances for meth because its reagent wasn't available at the time. Before I was able to start testing the substances I had to put a small amount of the substance into a beaker and shake. This step allowed myself and other classmates to have more drug to work with. After placing a couple of drops on the clear test plates we added each of the reagents to the drops and took its pH to determine if the substances were cocaine or LSD. By completing this lab I was able to get the feel on how forensic scientists are able to determine if an unknown substance is a drug.

Poison Lab

     Prior to starting this lab we were asked to think of possible poisons. But first it helps to know the definition of a poison: a substance that, when introduced into or absorbed by a living organism, causes death or injury. Here are a few that myself and group members came up with: Pesticide, bug bites, antifreeze, and lead. A poison can also be a material that an individual is allergic to for instance, sugar for diabetics, and milk for individuals who are Lactose Intolerant. Symptoms of poison can be enlarged pupils, bleeding out of the eyes, nose, mouth and ears, nausea and a difference in skin tone.
     For this activity we were to test to see if the any of the six given substances were poisonous. For aspirin, iodine, sugar, cyanide,  a household cleaning product and metal poison, each substance had their own indicators located nearby. By completing this lab I realized that poison can play a major role in revealing criminals because there was probably a reason on my a criminal might have used the poison for an individual case. For example, maybe the killer knew that the victim was diabetic so he/ she overdosed the individual as their means of murder. This could now limit forensic scientists to look for individuals who were close to the victim and knew that he/she was diabetic.